Monday, June 20, 2011

checks and balances of constitution

images Checks And Balances checks and balances of constitution. whipping out the quot;Checks
  • whipping out the quot;Checks


    • newlife2
    09-19 10:40 PM
    Guys, I was just laid off and have efiled i539 3 days after the termination date for a status change to F2. Now working on the application letter. Do you think I should mention the layoff in the letter?

    If I do mention it:

    Con: The layoff might quickly catch the eyes of the immigration officer and if he want to check my status, he could find out the 3 days OOS.

    Pro: My previous job was well paid. By mentioning it, I give the reason that why I want to stay at home as F2 instead of keeping the well paid job.


    I guess I will mention it in the letter to explain the whole situation and hope everything will be all right. Let me know if anybody disagrees asap, I will mail out the stuff with in next two days.



    wallpaper whipping out the quot;Checks checks and balances of constitution. Checks and Balances
  • Checks and Balances


    • map_boiler
    08-02 01:41 PM
    FedEx is the best, by far. UPS next. DHL is the worst (my personal experience).

    Always use FedEx, and if not possible, use UPS. Never DHL.

    FedEx is the best shipping company for both domestic and international.

    DHL is worse than UPS.

    It is in this order

    FedEX
    UPS
    DHL

    I have very very bad experiance with DHL.



    checks and balances of constitution. Checks and alances to Obama…
  • Checks and alances to Obama…


    • Anders �stberg
    May 3rd, 2005, 06:36 AM
    Thanks Mats!

    That's great info as a starting point. What I can safely say is that my panning technique is non-existent, so I'm probably safer with shorter shutter times. If the weather improves a bit I'll try it at tomorrow evening's practice session.
    July Vb Fiasco Resolved...its Time To Track The Progess [Archive] - Immigration Voice
    Log in

    View Full Version : July Vb Fiasco Resolved...its Time To Track The Progess




    2011 Checks and Balances checks and balances of constitution. The constitution of India
  • The constitution of India


    • Dhundhun
    07-16 04:03 AM
    USCIS decided a date Jun 1, 2006 to be current for EB2, so that Visa Numbers are not lost this year. This they decided on the basis of numbers of applications they were able to process by Jul 8, 2008. We all know that I485 Processing Date for NSC was Jul 28, 2007 and TSC was July 17, 2007. These dates were posted on Jun 15 and by July 8, might have moved by a day or two.

    Last year USCIS announced (I remember it was last quarter) that for processing all the files received will take around 18 months. We have just 6-9 months gone.

    Jul - Sep, the Priority date should not change, because USCIS has to approve all the processed application, they think approvable.

    In Oct, also it may remain same, but after that, it will not be able to sustain demand and face retrogression. Nov 2008 to Jun 2009 there may be seesaw of Priority Date +/-1 years of 2005.

    Jul-Aug 2009 USCIS may come across similar situation as this year - but in this case all applications of July 2007 processed - I think that time PD will be some date in 2005.

    Right now Processing date might be frozen of 2-3 months, because USCIS may put entire energy in approving EB2 processed cases.


    more...

    checks and balances of constitution. call checks and alances .
  • call checks and alances .


    • smuggymba
    09-17 11:19 PM
    FB spillover from a year gets added to overall EB quota of 140K for next year. And each category gets its proportional share of the spillover.

    do we know how much it is for this year?



    checks and balances of constitution. with checks and alances.
  • with checks and alances.


    • casinoroyale
    02-06 09:11 PM
    >IS ADMIN PROC DIFFERENT FROM ADD ADMIN PROC ???

    No. Its all the same 221(g) or Administrative Processing.


    more...

    checks and balances of constitution. checks and alances.
  • checks and alances.


    • smuggymba
    09-14 02:38 PM
    Is there a way to find all "active" members? If we're in the range 5000, then 10 per month for every user is good.

    I saw many ppl in August who came in and posted that they got GC, not sure how many of them used IV and donated.



    2010 Checks and alances to Obama… checks and balances of constitution. Checks And Balances
  • Checks And Balances


    • gparr
    May 1st, 2005, 07:50 PM
    Actually, he did get just that. But he was panning so fast that it took several hours for the blur to catch up with the rest of the image.
    Timing is everything. Superb shooting Anders. ;)


    more...

    checks and balances of constitution. and checks and alances
  • and checks and alances


    • suman
    12-17 01:38 PM
    Sorry I was away from my computer for a while.

    Thanks for all your help Guys.
    We are talking to Lawyer, Murthy law today.

    It's an employment based.
    This case of I-485 is 2004.
    We talked to USCIS and they say to wait for notice and they do not have nay reason to tell over phone as they do not have access to NOTICE.

    Hope Lawyer comes out with something.

    THank you all
    Great help and moral support from all of you at Immigration VOice.



    hair The constitution of India checks and balances of constitution. checks and alances of the
  • checks and alances of the


    • GC_newbee
    10-29 09:03 PM
    ^bump


    more...

    checks and balances of constitution. checks and alances that
  • checks and alances that


    • globaldesi
    05-14 10:25 AM
    My HR notified me yesterday that they have received the receipt for my H1B. Thank God! Good luck to everyone awaiting a response.

    Quota - General
    Premium Processing - No
    Notification Date - 04/28/08
    Receipt Number - Yes
    Notified via - email from HR
    Employer - Company
    Multiple Petitions - No



    hot call checks and alances . checks and balances of constitution. checks and alances,
  • checks and alances,


    • pappu
    08-22 08:06 PM
    I don't think the core is even bothered to take up on issues like this where USCIS operations is concerned..

    why wait for all these bills to get passed to recapture visas and stuff like that when the ideal solution would be to make USCIS more efficient...

    Let's say Hr5882 passes in 2009... and recaptures all the lost visas ..but what will happen in 2012 ?? I assume another recapture bill would have to be passed to recapture the recaptured visas... this is all a joke....

    Why cant USCIS be more efficient and transparent from the beginning but I guess the core doesn't think its important enough right now.

    Wrong.
    We have had meetings with USCIS, DOS in the past. In fact there was a meeting with USCIS director too in the recent past.

    Wish the problems were very simple to solve. Please do not underestimate the effort of the core team just because we do not post everything we do on the public forum. You can get information from your state chapter if you have any doubts. We are also like you and are trying our best within limited resources and time. The least this community can do is not criticize the core team and take out their frustration on us. We really need everyone to support us and contribute so that we can invest more in lobbying efforts if we need to try and get some relief. Fixing a system is not easy. Our programmer friends on the forum know this how difficult it is to fix a program that is too slow and buggy!!


    more...

    house checks-and-alances within checks and balances of constitution. Checks+and+alances+scale
  • Checks+and+alances+scale


    • 123456mg
    07-20 02:38 AM
    Please do not listen to anyone telling you that you can not do such-and-such just because you have filed I-485 application. In general, most of the times it is company attorney filing your I-485 and just asking you to sign the document at the mark placed and some candidates do not even bother to take a copy of the forms that they will be signing. If you have already taken a copy of your I-765 (EAD) and I-131 (travel document/AP), please confirm the next. Most of the times, the attorney puts the business address of the law firm as the address where USCIS should mail-in the EAD card. For AP, you may find your address.

    Now coming back to original question, you will have to fill form AR-11 and send it to USCIS. I am not sure if you have to send more than one copies of that to USCIS (one for your H1B and one for your AOS when you get the receipt number) so it will be on file with USCIS. By law, it is a must that you provide your proper address change info to USCIS.



    tattoo with checks and alances. checks and balances of constitution. of checks and alances in
  • of checks and alances in


    • mbawa2574
    05-22 09:48 AM
    Doe anybody have any doubt who developed USCIS software?............ Loser's Guild.

    :D:D:D:D Funded by Numbers USA:D:D:D


    more...

    pictures checks and alances. checks and balances of constitution. with checks and alances
  • with checks and alances


    • gc_on_demand
    05-20 12:52 PM
    Here is link to full article..

    http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?r110:13:./temp/~r110hBM8XT::

    Some one posted on IV that Mr. SESSIONS supported recapture but opposed AgJobs portion. Truth is he only supported EB5 programme where US can make money.

    This post is only for awareness. Please call these guys and let them know what we are and what we are fighting for.

    It will not increase GC. which Sessions was saying yesterday. CALL NOW>>

    "It would also increase the number of employment-based green cards that will be given out over the next few years by 218,000. It is called green card recapture. I note that a green card, in effect, gives permanent legal status to a person who has a green card, and a guaranteed path to citizenship, as long as they don't have some felony offense. It would reauthorize the Foreign Investor Visa Program. That program probably deserves consideration for renewal and reauthorization. I just thought we certainly have not discussed it in the Judiciary Committee, where I think it is supposed to be coming forward. No hearings have been held on it. It was stuck in while the appropriators were considering funding our military men and women in Iraq and in other places. It was stuck into that without any real debate. "



    dresses checks and alances, checks and balances of constitution. The constitution of 1831 - which was considered one of the most liberal of
  • The constitution of 1831 - which was considered one of the most liberal of


    • a1b2c3
    08-05 11:51 AM
    it was pending..pls check the PM I sent you.


    more...

    makeup and checks and alances checks and balances of constitution. checks-and-alances within
  • checks-and-alances within


    • h4hopeful
    05-31 12:56 PM
    You should look at it from the point of view of the immigration officer, that person was 50% immigrant and because of that needs to apply for a Green Card, on the mean time one visit a year for less than 90 days or one visit every two years for 6 months will make them a 25% of the time or less resident of USA, which doesn't raise any flag, you have to put yourself in the shoes of the immigration officer.

    On the same lines, one of my relative was also denied entry into the US at the Mineapolis airport. She is a widow, 70 years of age, and used to come here to visit her only son and daughter-in-law and their son, since last 6 years. She used to stay for 6 months during the summer time (April to Oct.) and then 6 months in India. But this time when she came here they denied her entry suggesting that you have a pattern of staying here since last 6-7 years at the same time of the year, so you are doing something illegal!!!!......

    Now how can one explain this???....70 years of age, a widow and her only son and daughter-in-law earning together earning atleast 6 figure income, a house of their own.....never went out of status, never extendend her stay beyond 6 months.......doing something illegal? and that too they said that they 'suspect'!....no proof whatsoever.....but according to law, she had to go back....this sucks big big time.



    girlfriend of checks and alances in checks and balances of constitution. US Checks and Balances.gif
  • US Checks and Balances.gif


    • Blog Feeds
    09-18 10:20 AM
    AILA Leadership Has Just Posted the Following:


    https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEilN9JuMKDI_zO591cGYK44lNV0mTaQcDjkr9d7mXEo09lGNI5QQBwpl46Qa8kwCkgpme9dI6S3ZqGs6NXqF1YT-6BIYDz5Mq4co_YoqeJKC292F6SURjGd-ZJpLYpFQtX6ABqfOQaUKcU/s320/Wilson+Liar.jpg (https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEilN9JuMKDI_zO591cGYK44lNV0mTaQcDjkr9d7mXEo09lGNI5QQBwpl46Qa8kwCkgpme9dI6S3ZqGs6NXqF1YT-6BIYDz5Mq4co_YoqeJKC292F6SURjGd-ZJpLYpFQtX6ABqfOQaUKcU/s1600-h/Wilson+Liar.jpg)During President Obama's address to a joint session of Congress on Tuesday, Congressman Joe Wilson (R. SC), shouted "LIAR!" when President Obama stated that the proposed health care plan would not cover "illegal aliens." Now, Joe Wilson said he should know this because he once was an immigration lawyer (http://www.riehlworldview.com/carnivorous_conservative/2009/09/rep-joe-wilson-speaks-to-rwv.html). Whether that meant immigration from or to South Carolina, I am not sure, but one thing is for sure, no one I know ever knew Joe Wilson the immigration lawyer. If by "immigration lawyer" Mr. Wilson meant that he once helped an immigrant get deported, I am not sure that really counts. But if "Joe the Immigration Lawyer" is like "Joe the Plumber," then maybe he thinks he really was one.

    After all, an immigration lawyer would likely be able to understand what exactly the law means when it says that only citizens and permanent residents are covered under the Obama plan. What has caused Joe Wilson to react like this, besides a serious lack of self control, is the provision in the proposed legislation that eliminates the requirement of using the "SAVE" system to verify whether someone who is an immigrant, is legally in the United States. Use of this program has stopped very few undocumented immigrants from getting public benefits, but has stopped literally thousands of U.S. citizens, mostly poor, from obtaining benefits because of their lack of accessible proof of their citizenship.

    Factcheck.org has presented a short article on Seven Falsehoods About Health Care (http://www.factcheck.org/2009/08/seven-falsehoods-about-health-care/). One of those applies directly to this point:

    False: Illegal Immigrants Will Be Covered. One Republican congressman issued
    a press release claiming that "5,600,000 Illegal Aliens May Be Covered Under Obamacare (http://steveking.house.gov/index.cfm?FuseAction=Newsroom.PressReleases&ContentRecord_id=a294b300-19b9-b4b1-1296-659af869849a&Region_id=&Issue_id=)," and we�ve been peppered with queries about similar claims. They�re not true. In fact, the House bill (the only bill to be formally introduced in its entirety) specifically says that no federal money would be spent on giving illegal immigrants health coverage:

    H.R. 3200: Sec 246 � NO FEDERAL PAYMENT FOR UNDOCUMENTED ALIENS. Nothing in this subtitle shall allow Federal payments for affordability credits on behalf of individuals who are not lawfully present in the United States.

    Also, under current law, those in the country illegally don�t qualify for federal health programs. Of interest: About half of illegal immigrants have health insurance now, according to the nonpartisan Pew Hispanic Center, which says those who lack insurance do so principally because their employers don�t offer it."Misleading GOP Health Care Claims" (http://factcheck.org/2009/07/misleading-gop-health-care-claims/) July 23 � by Brooks Jackson, Viveca Novak, Lori Robertson and Jess Henig.


    I can certainly see both sides of the debate, and, frankly, neither side is being completely honest or clear. What is quite clear, is how immigration, and our broken immigration system, keeps coming up in the context of the debate of national agenda items, such as the health care debate.



    Several weeks ago I blogged on the danger that the tone of the Health care debate (http://ailaleadership.blogspot.com/2009/08/healthcare-debate-and-immigration.html)had for the coming immigration reform debate. Calling the President a Liar during his speech to a joint session to Congress is Exhibit A in what we have in store for the coming debate. If Joe Wilson the Immigration Lawyer can misrepresent the consequences of legislative language as straight forward as these two particular sections, we have to be prepared for the extraordinary misrepresentations of any positive aspects of an immigration reform bill. Whether it is "amnesty," "rewarding law breakers," "open borders," "Liars," or even "destroyers of American culture" we have to understand how to phrase and present the response. Without a doubt, the response from those of us who understand the need to balance immigration reform, with security concerns, and with economic growth has to be not only vocal, but focused. We, as Real Immigration Lawyers, must know the language of the proposed legislation, we must know the myths that are out there, and we need to be vocal in our response.




    Next week, more than 40 talk radio hosts are descending on Capital Hill for the FAIR (http://www.splcenter.org/intel/intelreport/article.jsp?aid=846)Annual Scare the Crap Out of Congress Boondoggle. The outrageous claims of the downfall of America caused by illegal immigration, along with similarly nutty myths will be presented as facts. Actual real news organization will cite the Center for Immigration Studies as a legitimate source of information. We must be prepared to call into our local radio stations, whose hosts are in D.C. next week, and be prepared to present the facts of immigration. Not by sugar coating the problems that are caused by illegal immigration, but rather by pointing out which specific laws are broken (INA 212(a)(9) anyone?) and how having a comprehensive solution can actually fix the immigration pothole in the legislative superhighway. Immigration Lawyers it is time to Stand Up and be vocal and beat back the immigration myths (http://www.aila.org/content/default.aspx?bc=27924).





    https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/186823568153827945-8070452709764975137?l=ailaleadership.blogspot.com


    More... (http://ailaleadership.blogspot.com/2009/09/liar-what-does-health-care-have-to-do.html)



    hairstyles checks and alances that checks and balances of constitution. Checks and Balances 397x480 - 29.7K - jpeg www.clas.ufl.edu.
  • Checks and Balances 397x480 - 29.7K - jpeg www.clas.ufl.edu.


    • yabadaba
    08-14 01:07 PM
    you asked if you were missing something... i said yes you are. u asked for an explanation..so be it..and i put in a disclaimer...that what you were missing was anybody's guess



    gparr
    July 27th, 2005, 06:25 PM
    Ajp, your too hard on yourself, I think your version turned out great. Gary, how about a psd version for the nikon users, although I may be wasting my time since you've several nice results from those who have posted.

    Nik,
    Ask and you shall receive. It's a 40 MB monster file. I took the RAW file and ran it through the PSCS RAW converter without altering it in any way, then saved as a psd file. Hope it's what you need.
    Gary

    http://www.gparr.com/images/gparrpsd.zip



    prom2
    10-30 08:25 AM
    My lawyer received our AP's yesterday. They sent me a photocopy. Even though the TSC IO said that my application was approved on 10/17/2007, the travel document has a date of 10/11/2007. Good luck to you.


    I haven't received them yet.

    Thank you.


    Posted by Aysel at 9:04 AM

    No comments:

    Post a Comment

    Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)